You cannot predict price with 100 percent certainty, and anyone who promises otherwise is bluffing. The market owes no one anything. But that does not mean earning is impossible: a professional does not guess where price will go. They work with probabilities and with mathematical expectation, building a system where, over distance, the plus outweighs the minus even when individual trades lose.
People often ask me how to predict where price will go, and I will say it at once: I do not do it and I do not believe in it. Trading since 2013, I have become sure of a simple thing, that forecasts are a thankless business. The market is not an equation you can solve in advance. It can be traded, though, once you stop guessing and start thinking in probabilities, and that is what we will talk about: why you cannot predict price and how to earn systematically anyway.
In this article we'll cover:
- price cannot be predicted with 100 percent certainty, the market owes no one anything;
- the beginner's main mistake is trying to guess the future instead of reacting to the fact on the chart;
- a systematic trader thinks in probabilities, not predictions: see it first, then join;
- you earn not by guessing but through a positive mathematical expectation over distance.
Let us start with an honest answer to the main question: can price be predicted at all.

Can You Actually Predict Market Prices?
The short answer is no, not to 100 percent, and that is not pessimism but a sober view. Price is moved by thousands of participants, by news, by central-bank actions and by the emotions of the crowd, and accounting for all of that in advance is impossible. So any promise of an exact forecast is either self-deception or advertising.
The beginner's main mistake is exactly this: hunting for a way to know the future, stretching indicators over the chart, chasing signals, believing in patterns, while the market simply goes the other way. In my experience the honest approach is different: do not predict, react to what the market has already shown, see the fact on the chart first and only then join. Of all of technical analysis, the most adequate tool for that, to my mind, is levels, and the precise trade entry point is shown in detail in the course.

What to Do Instead of Predicting
Here is the key difference a beginner needs to catch. A prediction is an attempt to say in advance what will happen. A probability is an assessment of what is more advantageous to do right now, based on the facts on the chart. I look at it this way: levels on a chart are, in essence, probabilities, and in a news situation they are probabilities ten times over.
I do not tell myself price will definitely reverse. I say: here is a level where there was interest before, the odds of a bounce here are higher, and if the market confirms it with volume, I join. Buying here obliges me to nothing, because price may not reverse, but the probability is on my side, and that is the thinking of a systematic trader. I build this approach on the accumulation and distribution of the Wyckoff method and on Volume Analysis in Trading: A Complete Guide: I read what large capital is doing rather than trying to outrun it with a forecast, and always with a stop, because I allow that I am wrong. This is not personal advice, only how I think, and why trying to forecast traps a beginner I show in my video on why price prediction fails.
My Experience: Math Expectation, Not Guessing
Mathematical expectation is the average result of trades over a long distance, counting both profits and losses, and it is that, not guessing, that makes a trader profitable. You do not need to guess every trade: out of 100 trades a share will always lose, which is normal, and in my experience about a third go into the minus. What matters is that the winning trades, in sum, outweigh the losers, which is achieved through the risk-to-reward ratio. If I risk one and take three, a ratio of one to three, the system stays in the plus even at 40 percent winning trades. The math is on my side as long as I follow the rules.
One more important point: over distance losses do not come evenly but in series, and five or six losing trades in a row is normal variance. That is exactly why risk per trade is kept small, otherwise a run of losses knocks out the account before the statistics have time to work in your favour. So a system matters more than predictions: if you enter and exit without understanding why, you are on the side of a negative expectation, which over distance guarantees losing money. A clear entry, a clear exit, a stop always, and the full breakdown of mathematical expectation with examples is in the course.
Frequently Asked Questions
Not to 100 percent. Price is moved by thousands of participants and by news, and accounting for it all in advance is impossible. In my experience it is more honest not to predict but to react to the fact on the chart and work with probabilities.
Indicators are derivatives of price; they describe the past and lag. They do not know the future. So I do not build a forecast on them but look at levels and volume, at what the market is showing right now.
Through mathematical expectation. You do not need to guess every trade; you need the winning trades to outweigh the losers in sum. That comes from the risk-to-reward ratio and discipline, even with only part of your trades in profit.
It means not saying price will definitely go somewhere, but assessing which scenario is more advantageous now from the facts on the chart. You join a level where the odds are on your side, confirmed by volume, and always with a stop because you allow you are wrong.
About the Author
Author: Igor Arapov, independent researcher in the psychology of investment decisions and behavioral finance, practising trader since 2013, founder of arapov.trade, author of a trading book series (Open Library), (ORCID: 0009-0003-0430-778X).




